Sunday, April 7, 2013

Teammates on fire

Playing in the regional Swiss today, our teammates were on fire. How good were they?

Try bidding out East-West hands. Can you now find the small slam in clubs?
.
Board: 
Vul: E-W
Dlr: West
N
North
Kxx
QJTxx
K10xx
x
.
W
West
Qxx
x
A52
AJx xxx
Lead: ♥Q
E
East
Axxx
AKx
QJxx
KQ
.
S
South
Jxxx
xxxx
xx
xxx
.
And having found the small slam, can you bring it home? What is your line?

The solution that our team-mate found at the table was to realize that he could make on 3-3 diamonds and that a squeeze position existed if the defender with the king of spades also had 4 diamonds. So, he combined the two chances and took the losing diamond finesse, thus rectifying the count. Then, he played clubs from hand until he reached this end position:
.
Board: 16
Vul: E-W
Dlr: West
N
North
Kx
109
.
W
West
Qx
x
A
Lead: 4
E
East
Ax
Jx
.
S
South
.
On the A of clubs, North is squeezed.  Pretty good, eh, for someone who's been playing only a couple of years?  (With the calmness of hindsight, simply leading twice to the QJ would also have worked, but that is a boring line!)

Unfortunately, we ran into a team of former partners and team-mates on the last round. It was "Norman A" vs. "Norman B". After 7 boards, the match was tied.  Since we were leading going in, a tie would have won us the tournament.  But ... on the hand that matters, we were both in 3NT. It came down to a guess of hearts. I was declarer; I guessed wrong; the opponents guessed right. And that was the match.  So, 8 gold points instead of 11 on a stupid guess.  My mishap, although I don't think I would guess any differently the second time. It just so happened that the same defender had both missing aces this time ...

Still, if you'd told me that my first-time partnership and our team (the sum of whose points is under 600) would land up second in the Swiss, I'd have been thrilled.  And so, I am!

2 comments:

  1. Congrats on your nice finish. You didn't say how your teammates bid 6C.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I believe it went something like this:
      P - 1C (16+)
      2C (8+, gf) - 2NT (17-19)
      6C
      when West realized that there was no configuration of 18 points in a balanced East hand that didn't offer play for 12 tricks.

      If we had been E-W, we probably would not have found it since (a) we open light and (b) we would have run out of space:
      2C (10-15, 5+ clubs) - 2D (Stayman)
      3C (6 clubs, 10-12) - 3NT

      With partners with whom I play 2/1, it would have gone:
      P - 1D
      2C - 2NT (if the 2C promises one more bid)
      and West has a difficult decision.

      Delete